Which Is Better, Concrete X-ray Or Ground Pe.rating Radar (gpr)-sichen

By , July 24, 2018 1:17 pm

.puters-and-Technology In order to answer this question thoroughly, first we must look at both of these scanning techniques individually. What is Concrete X-Raying? Exactly what it says it does – concrete x-raying revolves around x-raying concrete to search for solid objects within. Both sides of the object must be accessible as a film has to be applied on the opposite side to the x-ray device in order to see through the object. What is Ground Pe.rating Radar? GPR involves the use of a radar emitting machine rolled over a test site, emitting radio waves into the test area. These bounce back into the receiver, if there is an anomaly in readings it means there is a hidden item in the test area. GPR can be used on a multitude of materials with reliable results. So which is best? Surprisingly, this is an easy question to answer. Ground pe.rating radar has jumped to the forefront of various scanning services, especially concrete scanning. X Ray is rarely used in modern construction. But why was it fazed out? The main reason is safety. X-Ray radiation is notoriously dangerous, especially when used on a regular basis. Although X-Ray techniques have a lot of benefits to the job, GPR eclipses it on many levels, including lower cost, easier usage and it is a lot more safe. GPR radio waves are about as damaging as the average mobile phone, there is no radiation emitted. Due to this, it isn’t disrupting to other work in the area and doesn’t require any special equipment to equal its power. On the other hand, concrete x-rays call for a lot of Personal Protection Equipment for its’ technicians. In order to keep damage to a minimum, it is also necessary to clear an area of 80 foot around the test site. Another factor in the debate is time. GPR can test a site, collect its results and give detailed feedback all in a matter of hours. X-Rays are time consuming to carry out, can only test a limited area each day and its’ findings have to be analysed off-site. In the hectic world of construction, with its strict time restrictions, X-Rays can cause far too much hassle and disruption to a busy construction site. It’s not all one-sided however – GPR does have its downfalls too. Although it works well under most conditions, if a slab of concrete is over 18 inches thick, the GPR loses resolution due to lower frequency. This is not the same with concrete x-raying, which can still process a substantially thick concrete slab. It does, however, require access to both sides of a slab in order to collect a reading. In conclusion, both technologies offer a variety of helpful positive attributions. However, GPR proves to be the best choice for construction needs due to its low cost, fast results, user friendliness and accurate conclusions. About the Author: 相关的主题文章:

Comments are closed