Baidu promotion is not advertising Patients with rare diseases to the General Administration of indu 索尼a350

By , November 14, 2017 10:01 pm

"Baidu promotion" is not advertising? Patients with rare disease to the SAIC to say – China news network, Baidu promotion is not advertising? This problem has spawned more than 30 public institutions jointly sponsored by the "Internet Community Alliance fake medical ads". In May this year, the members of the league, Yuan Nana will be a rare disease of the State Administration for Industry and commerce to the court, ask for a public "Beijing Industrial and Commercial Bureau About Baidu promotion should be based on whether a judicial verdict for approval from" the contents of advertisements. The case recently in Beijing first intermediate people’s court hearing. Yuan Nana is the founder of the pocket house of public welfare organizations. As a member of the Internet advertising fake medical charity Union, he feels obliged to stand up. Yuan Nana in the prosecution said, in early 2008, Beijing Industrial and Commercial Bureau had to ask whether the SAIC Baidu promotion advertising, 2013 Beijing Industrial and Commercial Bureau again to submit the "Beijing City Administration for Industry and Commerce Industrial and Commercial Bureau About Baidu promotion should be based on whether a judicial verdict for advertising display" please. SAIC is on the "instructions" made a reply? And how to reply? These people are not informed. So, he picked up the government information disclosure in April 2016 26 to the State Administration for Industry and commerce, for Public Administration for Industry and Commerce on the 2013 "Beijing Industrial and Commercial Bureau About Baidu promotion should be based on whether a judicial verdict for approval from" the contents of advertisements." In May 11th the State Administration for Industry and Commerce replied, "what you ask for is not the government information which is promoted by the government information disclosure regulations of the People’s Republic of China." Dissatisfaction with the attitude of the competent authorities, yuan na on May 26 to the court in charge of the General Administration of industry and commerce. Asked the court to revoke the General Administration of industry and Commerce open word (2016) No. 12 disclosure of government information disclosure, ordered the defendant to make a deal. "It’s been 8 years. How long are you going to be ready?" During the trial, the case to the General Administration of industry and commerce. He said that SAIC should reply in the first to inform whether the existence of the reply, if not, it should be in accordance with the regulations third clearly informed of the twenty-first. If SAIC made instructions to the Beijing trade and Industry Bureau, should also be in accordance with the provisions of the provisions of the Ordinance does not disclose the reasons. "There is, there is no, there is no, can not say ‘being studied’, which can not constitute an open legal basis." SAIC party said, refused to apply for public information, Nana, is because the government information matters, Nana application publication does not belong to the "Regulations" provisions, the practice of administration of industry and commerce legal compliance. In fact, on Baidu promotion and other paid search is advertising? SAIC has a clear attitude. In September 1st this year, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce promulgated the Interim Measures for the management of Internet advertising, the official implementation of which, to promote the sale of goods or services paid search advertising belongs to Internet advertising. Reporters found that Baidu has paid search links in the commercial promotion changed to advertising". The case will be scheduled for sentencing. Wu Qingyu相关的主题文章:

Comments are closed